RESUMEN
Various methods have been described to isolate third generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistant Enterobacteriaceae from foods, but it is not known how comparable they are between studies. Here, the performance of five enrichment broths and two selective agars are compared for their ability to isolate 3GC resistant Enterobacteriaceae from retail chicken, beef, pork, and veal samples. The results showed equivalence between Enterobacteriaceae enrichment broth (EE), lauryl sulfate broth (LST), and modified typtone soy broth (mTSB). Lower isolation rates were observed when LST and mTSB were supplemented with the 3GC antibiotic cefotaxime. The overall performance of MacConkey agar supplemented with cefotaxime and a proprietary selective agar (ESBL CHROMagar) was equivalent, although differences linked to the microbiota of specific meat commodities were noted. Regardless of the isolation method, further screening was required to confirm the taxonomy and resistance of the presumptive positive strains. Approximately 40% of confirmed 3GC resistant foodborne Enterobacteriaceae strains tested positive for extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) activity. Strains that were resistant to ceftriaxone and susceptible to cefoxitin were more likely to test positive for ESBL activity, as were strains that possessed either of two ESBL genes (blaSHV or blaTEM). Based on our results, we recommend using an antibiotic-free enrichment broth, two selective agars, and an isolate screening strategy to isolate 3GC resistant Enterobacteriaceae from retail meats. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and/or PCR screening for blaSHV or blaTEM can then be used to identify ESBL producing strains among the 3GC resistant meat isolates. The adoption of this approach by the research community will enable more effective monitoring of antibiotic resistance rates and trends among foodborne Enterobacteriaceae over time and across jurisdictions.
